This week’s provocation: Stretch use cases for AI in strategy development
I ran a session with a leadership team this week in which we were working through how AI could be a true partner throughout the strategy development and deployment process. One of the issues in discussing this subject is the sheer breadth of application. Similarly to the innovation process, there’s just so many ways in which AI can be integrated at every stage and so to get the true benefit we need to truly think about it as a thought partner throughout.
The value of AI in this context is not only in efficiency but in how it can help you get to places that you probably wouldn’t have got to on your own. It ‘supercharges’ strategic processes because it both catalyses planning but also enables entirely new possibilities. Over the past few months I’ve written about using AI project spaces to develop strategy, using AI as a thought partner to challenge assumptions and think differently, using synthetic personas and research to explore ideas and using AI for simulation and scenario planning in strategy.
I’ve set out a (far from comprehensive) list of the more obvious AI use cases above, using Stephen King’s classic strategy cycle to give it some structure, but I thought it may be fun to dwell on some of the more unusual or thought-stretching ways of using AI for each stage, some of which came up in my recent workshop.
Situational awareness: Where are we?
Alongside the obvious ways in which AI can synthesise and deepen customer, category, cultural and company understanding, I’m fascinated by the whole idea of being able to better interpret weak and emerging signals. Some examples include:
Competitive intent: Beyond more obvious variables (market share, pricing, distribution) AI can infer competitive intent by analysing hiring patterns, leadership speeches, company report language, patent filings, customer reviews.
Synthetic future consumers: There are some very useful ways of using synthetic personas to explore ideas, but I like the idea of creating future AI personas trained on demographic and cultural data which can simulate how emerging customer groups might behave.
Fusing signals across domains: We often analyse markets in isolation but AI can also be used to connect faint signals across unrelated domains (science, patents, culture, policy). This can reveal the first signs of different forces colliding (for example AI + regulation + consumer activism) before they converge into disruptive change.
Clustering anomalies: Rather than just tracking trends, AI can detect clusters of anomalies across customer behaviour, competitor actions, or market data which may indicate the first ripples of disruption.
Current state analysis: Why are we there?
I’m a fan of using AI to help with root cause analysis and iteratively using AI in a ‘5 whys’ approach to surface fundamental drivers and refine problem statements. But there are some other stretch use cases here too:
Causal simulations: We usually think about simulations in the context of future possibilities, but it can be interesting to feed a bunch of historical performance, leadership decisions, and cultural indicators into an AI and ask it to simulate ‘alternate histories’. What would have happened if a different decision had been made? This helps to uncover the real drivers of causality and can inform future scenarios.
Decision-path archaeology: similarly, AI can analyse board papers, financial reports, and outcomes, reconstructing past strategic decisions and surfacing decision biases, recurring blind spots, or patterns of over/under-reaction.
Narrative mapping: AI can process years of internal comms, reports, and leadership messaging to reveal the implicit stories that have guided behaviour. These hidden narratives can help explain inertia or misalignment.
Objective setting: Where could we be?
AI is pretty good at enabling better objective and goal definition but again, there’s also some more imaginative ways in which we can use it:
Counterfactual stretch goals: Asking AI to generate objectives that assume one core constraint is no longer a factor (‘If capital were unlimited, what would our 5-year goal be?’) can open up new possibilities which can then be scaled back more pragmatically.
Inverse benchmarking with synthetic competitors: We’re already familiar with developing synthetic personas but I’m also fascinated by the idea of using AI to generate ‘synthetic competitors’, or hypothetical firms which can be used to stress-test strategies or expose overlooked goals or possibilities.
Values-aligned objective generation: AI is of course pretty good at recommending financial or market-driven goals, but don’t forget that it can also synthesise (potentially more inspiring) objectives based on stated values, purpose and to a degree the cultural DNA of a business.
Strategy formulation: How could we get there?
Some of my favourite stretch techniques here involve constraints-driven and recombinant thinking:
Constraint-flipping: Inverting assumptions (‘what if we had to achieve this with half the resources?’) using AI can help to generate unconventional pathways or creative shortcuts.
Adjacency recombination: I love norm-switching as a way to break out your sector assumptions, and cross industry analogies using AI (like applying logistics optimisation techniques to healthcare strategy) can open up entirely new thinking.
Strategy sparring: Deploying multiple specialised AI personas (tech optimist, skeptic, regulator, innovator) to debate strategy options gives you a helpful range of divergent perspectives.
Measurement and tracking: Are we getting there?
Strategic drift detection: AI can be set up to continuously compare progress against stated goals and strategy both in terms of metrics tracking but also actions taken (meeting minutes, budgets, project outputs) to flag potential deviations early.
Emergent KPIs: As progress is made KPIs may need to change, so AI can propose new KPIs that may be better than pre-defined ones.
Future-back metrics: Rather than just starting with the KPIs that may seem right today, AI can generate different metrics by working backwards from desired long-term outcomes, which can help with the tracking of leading indicators of future success.
A lot of these stretch techniques are pretty nascent but they show how we’re only really scratching the surface of how AI will change strategy development and implementation. They are less obvious but their value comes from just that - they go beyond efficiency (where many strategists stop right now) and push AI into different territories like reframing, imagination, and discovery. Whilst these remain the parts of strategy that humans are strongest at, they are also ones that AI can now take to a whole new level.
Rewind and catch up:
Using AI for simulation and scenario planning in strategy
Transforming systems and thinking differently
Separating fads from trends, and the second and third order effects of AI
If you do one thing this week…
As you no doubt know by now (see above), I genuinely think that AI is a real game-changer for strategists and nowhere is this more true than in advertising and marketing. But oddly there are very few courses out there designed specifically for strategists and planners in the industry to help them understand how they can effectively work with AI throughout the planning process.
Which is why I've partnered with the IPA (Institute of Practitioners in Advertising) to design and launch their first course on 'Advanced AI for Strategy and Planning'. We're running the first one as two virtual half days in early December and it's now open for booking if you’re interested.
Links of the week
New Stanford research (PDF) by Erik Brynjolfsson and others set out to investigate whether Gen AI is leading to job losses in the roles that are most exposed to AI. The TL:DR is that young workers in ‘high-AI-exposure’ jobs (like software development and customer service) have experienced a 6% decline in employment since 2022, but interestingly this drop is only evident in jobs where AI automates work. Where it augments work, AI caused no drop.
The ‘shadow AI economy’ (staff using non-IT-approved AI tools in their work, often on their phones) is definitely a thing - I’ve come across this multiple times. Zoe Scaman linked to a useful piece about how to deal with it
This week Google released a new image model, Nano Banana (what’s with that name?) which makes it far easier to make creative edits (changing backgrounds etc) whilst maintaining consistent elements (characters). They’ve also released Opal as an experiment, a new agent builder/automation tool, similar to N8N (US only so needs VPN if you’re outside US). These automation tools are getting easier and better fast.
A useful view on prompting GPT 5
An interesting provocation from Cal Newport - what if AI doesn’t get much better than this?
And meanwhile Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman wrote a post warning about the risk that people believe AI systems have consciousness and should therefore have rights.
And finally…
This post by Derek Thompson about the huge technological changes that happened at the beginning of the 20th century (cars, airplanes, bicycles) and what it tells us about technology, anxiety and human nature was a wonderful read - lots of interesting parallels with today’s world.
Weeknotes
Last week we took a few days holiday in the South West (hence no update) and the weather was wonderfully kind to us. I came back to run a strategy and AI leadership session this week with the board of a forwards-looking Ed Tech business. Next week (and the week after) I’m back on the road running a couple of multi-day workshops. Lots of travel this quarter but I’m reminded of Henry Miller’s thought: ‘One's destination is never a place, but a new way of seeing things’.
Thanks for subscribing to and reading Only Dead Fish. It means a lot. This newsletter is 100% free to read so if you liked this episode please do like, share and pass it on.
If you’d like more from me my blog is over here and my personal site is here, and do get in touch if you’d like me to give a talk to your team or talk about working together.
My favourite quote captures what I try to do every day, and it’s from renowned Creative Director Paul Arden: ‘Do not covet your ideas. Give away all you know, and more will come back to you’.
And remember - only dead fish go with the flow.






So much in this article to save and digest. So much.
*For entertainment purposes only*
Food and Water Watch
Instead of saving resources the Tech Bros (cheered on by the uber rich) have built AI to be as incompetent as they are.
At present, the Tech Bros are bullying farmers off of their land to build huge data centers next to the farmers they couldn’t bully; then they proceed to steal groundwater from neighboring farms to the point, they can’t even grow enough food to feed themselves. They do all of this so that AI can continue to guzzle water and land resources unsustainably. I guess the goal is to build a machine planet because there will be no people if you can’t grow food.
I thought these guys were smart?! The first order of business should be to give AI the tools/knowledge to figure out how it can function off of LESS power…you know like create its own power source that doesn’t involve screwing up the planet worse than it already is.
All I can say is these people like shitting in their own shoes… constantly messing up the environment, doing nothing to fix it and forever talking about how they’re going to leave earth to ‘colonize’ other planets, like they have a right to.
It always amazes me why they think life beyond planet earth would want THEM in their solar system.
Garbage in, garbage out!