Fish Food: Episode 608
Cognitive diversity as a superpower, consultants as the winners from AI, the Digital Marketing hype cycle, 'share of model' and the future of strategy
If you do one thing this week…
Cognitive diversity as a superpower
'If we are intent upon answering our most serious questions, from climate change to poverty, and curing diseases to designing new products, we need to work with people who think differently, not just accurately. And this requires us to take a step back and view performance from a fundamentally different vantage point'
I'm reading Matthew Syed's Rebel Ideas book at the moment and it makes a compelling case for the power of cognitive (alongside other forms of) diversity. Matthew describes how we need to think of human performance far more from the standpoint of teams rather than individual performance, and how cognitive diversity in teams is an essential ingredient for success and more broadly for enabling a greater level of collective intelligence.
This is particularly important given the complexity of challenges that most teams face in the modern world. Gone are the days when a simple, linear approach to problem solving can reliably and consistently yield the best results. Linear kinds of problems can often be solved by existing, or relatively focused knowledge. Simple problems can be solved by individuals, complex problems benefit from being solved by teams.
With complex problems a variety of perspectives yields more insight, not less. As Matthew says: '...solutions to complex problems typically rely on multiple layers of insight and therefore require multiple points of view'. The trick, he adds, is to 'find people with different perspectives that usefully impinge on the problem at hand'.
He gives a fascinating example of a study done by Richard E. Nisbett and Takahiko Masuda at the University of Michigan which analysed the differences in how an American and a Japanese audience responded differently to videos of underwater scenes. When asked to describe what they had seen the Americans focused almost entirely on the fish, whereas the Japanese talked overwhelmingly about the environment in which the fishes swam. This cultural difference in perspective demonstrates just how divergent our perception and how we think about an situation can be.
And that can be a fantastically useful thing. There's plenty of academic research that shows that teams that incorporate greater diversity of knowledge and perspectives are able to solve problems faster and better. Matthew has a lovely way of framing the benefit of diverse perspectives which can be represented by the diagrams and scenarios above.
The rectangles here are the problem space. The circles are the level of knowledge or useful outlooks that each team member has.
In the first scenario the team have big overlaps in their knowledge or perspective. Knowledge is clustered around certain areas. Perhaps they all think alike or have similar views, experiences and outlooks. It's worth noting that it's surprisingly common for this to be the case in teams. The London Business School/Ashridge study linked to above showed that whilst cognitive diversity is less visible than other types, there is often an inherent functional bias which can lead us to gravitate toward the people who seem to think and communicate in similar ways to us.
The second scenario incorporates far more diversity in experience or expertise or perspective. Here the leader needs to be brave enough not to stuff the team with likeminded people but instead to deliberately consider how the combination of different outlooks and knowledge may cover more of the problem space (as Matthew puts it: 'Successful teams are diverse, but not arbitrarily diverse'). Then it becomes about creating an environment in which everyone can contribute and share their ideas.
The third scenario is one that I've added. Here the team may have a diverse set of perspectives but the leader (the circle in the bottom left) does not enable or facilitate a broad set of contributions, or healthy debate and disagreement. So perspective is once again limited (to that of the domineering leader), or the team can fall foul of groupthink, which will not play well against complex problems.
A last thought from the book is about perspective blindness. We interpret the world through frames of reference but we can have a big blind spot when it comes to appreciating the different frames of reference amongst others. Matthew quotes John Cleese:
‘Everybody has theories. The dangerous people are those who are not aware of their own theories. That is, the theories on which they operate are largely unconscious.’
So we underestimate what we can learn from people with other points of view (David Foster Wallace's amazing 'This is Water' speech describes how our ways of thinking become so habitual that we rarely question how this filters our view of reality). Being surrounded by likeminded people simply reinforces these blind spots.
Cognitive diversity, in a complex world, is like a superpower.
Poll results: last week I ran a simple poll to ask whether you all found it useful for me to include longer posts (like the one above) alongside the usual links. Thanks to all who voted - 95% said yes, and only 5% said no. So where I can I’m going to continue to do this (I may miss the odd week due to heavy work schedules but will certainly try to keep this as regular as I can).
Links of the week
This week Meta released Llama 3.1 405B which they claim is the most sophisticated open source model available, and able to better top closed models like GPT-4o across several benchmarks. Rowan Cheung had an interview with Mark Zuckerberg (who looked like he’d just stepped off the beach) about this, Meta’s vision, and his view on the future of AI agents
Crikey. According to this NYT article around 40% of McKinsey’s business this year will be Generative AI related
A good essay from Benedict Evans on why the realisation of value from Generative AI may take longer than we think
This week Gartner just released the latest Digital Marketing Hype Cycle (highlights here), featuring their view on the upcoming tech trends that will impact marketing. Generative AI is descending rapidly into the trough of disillusionment, and meanwhile EmotionAI (which is a slightly terrifying idea) is the new thing apparently. Worth bearing in mind: one of my favourite concepts related to tech investment and the hype cycle is what Scott Brinker called ‘The Goldilocks Zone’
Well this is an interesting question from Yuval Noah Harari - What will happen to storytelling when books start reading people?
Meanwhile Google has changed it’s position re turning off cookies in Chrome and is instead offering users choice. Rebecca Sentance had a good piece on what this means for marketers
‘Share of model’ - a way of measuring a brand’s presence within AI data sets as a new marketing metric - is an interesting idea (via Tom Roach)
The folk at WARC got in touch to let me know that they’re doing their latest Future of Strategy survey. Always throws up some interesting things so if you’re a strategist/planner it’s well worth contributing.
Quote of the week
“There is only one success—to be able to spend your life in your own way.”
Christopher Morley (via Shane Parrish)
And finally…
An oldie but goodie - Apple’s marketing philosophy from 1977
Weeknotes
This week it was good to be at home after all the work travel I’ve been doing. I did another NHS workshop, one on AI in marketing for a veterinary pharma business, and I also did my quarterly digital trends webinars for Econsultancy. I also went to the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition which is an annual favourite thing to do. This painting, ‘Mindful Gaps’ by Tom Waszkowycz, took my breath away.
Thanks for subscribing to and reading Only Dead Fish. It means a lot. If you’d like more from me my blog is over here and my personal site is here. If you liked this episode do share and pass it on, and do get in touch if you’d like me to give a talk to your team or talk about working together.
My favourite quote captures what I try to do every day, and it’s from renowned Creative Director Paul Arden: ‘Do not covet your ideas. Give away all you know, and more will come back to you’.
Great edition!